Excepting that the BEGA football team is also has *RED*
<http://aflnational.com/nsw/sapphire-coast-afl/bega-bombers/>
Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#67)}
Don't be condescending you fascist maggot ...
The problem is you... and previously you stated that you lived near
BAIRNSDALE and the distance to BEGA is 326 km
Whereas the distance from BAIRNSDALE to SALE is 68 km
THE BEGA BOER WAR MEMORIAL IS DIFFERENT TO BEGA SOLDIERS MEMORIAL GATES
<https://www.warmemorialsregister.nsw.gov.au/content/bega-boer-war-memorial>
<https://www.warmemorialsregister.nsw.gov.au/content/bega-soldiers-memorial-gates>
THAT YOU MADE SUCH A MISTAKE "There was at the Bega War Memoral Arch
Dolf" IS PROOF THAT YOU ARE fascist lying maggot engaged in purposeful
slander.
Since the proximity is of relevance, I don't know why your stupidity
is so stubborn: perhaps it was the pretty *RED* (ie. *we* *note* *the*
*patterning* *with* *the* *subject* *of* *this* *thread*) of the wreath
*poppies* which took you there as jingoistic republicanism (ie. in
*Europe* *where* *the* battles were fought we called it nazism) upon our
nation
IT'S YOUR CHRISTOLOGY WHICH IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY AND
ESPECIALLY BY THE #36 - *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH*
It is unknown to us whether the first designations were known by
PYTHAGORAS at the time of Jewish captivity within Babylon as the
MIND (DAO: VIRTUE): #1 {#80 - LABOURING (CH'IN)} + #2 {#27 - DUTIES
(SHIH)} = #3
SCIENCE (DAO: TOOLS): #3 {#36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG)} + #4 {#47 -
PATTERN (WEN)} = #7
OPINION (DAO: POSITION): #5 {#41 - RESPONSE (YING)} + #6 {#52 -
MEASURE (TU)} = #11
SENSE (DAO: TIME): #7 {#55 - DEMINISHMENT (CHIEN)} + #8 {#61 -
EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)} = #15
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Will%20Be%20Done.pdf>
That in making a nomenclature consideration of #45 - METHODOLOGY the
#CENTRE of value PROPOSITION is that any DELIMITER is relative to the
AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE, thereby as a METATHEORY OF LOGIC is a stratum as
dialectic of meta-descriptor prototypes which always precedes it.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9 - PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
Whereas the SAPIENT OPINION FROM AN EXPERT and those of the IGNORANT
POSTULATIONS OF STUPIDITY might both direct themselves to the same
PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER, the dialectic of meta-descriptor prototypes can
yield entirely different results which may be vital or may not satisfy
our contingent need for a STATIC conception with an inclusion of any
ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE with deference to the resultant CATEGORY
OF UNDERSTANDING such as for example #432 - DEVOID OF TRUTH OR USELESS
which is then associated to our STATIC conception.
OUR EDUCATIONAL EXAMPLE IS AN OBSERVATION FROM A FIRE ZONE EVACUEE.
fun times being had,
Everythings packed, cars loaded, and we evacuate tomorrow morning,
Pretty *RED* glow out the lounge window tonight. Fire is due here late
tomorrow morning, have done all i can, unfortunately no water to fight
the fire, so no use staying.
Don't hold out much hope this time i'll be returning to the house,
the ground and bush is so dry,
With a bit of luck the wind wont come up and i'll be back on here
tomorrow, If not, will be back one day,
To all have a great New year."
41 57 1 #99 +
46 51 9 #106 = #205 +
45 27 10 #82 = #287
As the GRAPPLE [#41, #57, #1, #9, #10, #27, #45, #46, #51] PROTOTYPE
which conveys
(#41)}
SHOU (#98)}
(#108)}
{%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS,
DISTORTION: HSIEN (#118)}
(#236)}
*FROM* *DANGERS*); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#287)}
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #140 as [#5, #40, #1, #4, #40, #10, #600] / #45
as [#1, #4, #40] = ʼâdam (H119): {UMBRA: #0 as #45 % #41 = #4} 1) *TO*
*BE* *RED*, *RED*; 1a) (Qal) ruddy (of Nazarites); 1b) (Pual); 1b1) to
be rubbed red; 1b2) dyed red; 1b3) reddened; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) *TO*
*CAUSE* *TO* *SHOW* *RED*; 1c2) to glare; 1c3) *TO* *EMIT* (*SHOW*)
*REDNESS*; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to redden; 1d2) to grow red; 1d3) to
look red;
#350 as [#50, #90, #200, #10] /
#351 - ROMAN GOVERNANCE BINOMIAL STASIS PROTOTYPE #SEVEN as [#50,
#90, #6, #200, #5] /
#390 - *CROWN* as [#50, #90, #200, #10, #600] /
#260 as [#200, #50, #10] = nâtsar (H5341): {UMBRA: #0 as #340 % #41 =
#12} 1) to guard, watch, watch over, keep; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to watch,
guard, keep; 1a2) *TO* *PRESERVE*, *GUARD* *FROM* *DANGERS*; 1a3) to
keep, observe, guard with fidelity; 1a4) to guard, keep secret; 1a5) to
be kept close, be blockaded; 1a6) watchman (participle);
Since the AGENCY operation is in my informal view a utilitarian
function as organisational philosophy often involving some derivation as
the #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST / #237 - USE OF FORCE relative to the
ANTHROPOLOGY within the context of #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE and #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY.
However we notice that with such terms as ontological pacifist or
ontic jurisprudence that the faculties of knowledge are not fully
quantified. And so consequentially utilitarianism considers that actions
are right if they are useful or for the benefit of a majority. It
conveys a provisional doctrine that an action is right in so far as it
promotes happiness {ie. the notion of #24 - JOY (LE) which is CENTRAL to
the OBLIGATING NORM / *NORMA* *OBLIGANS*}, and that the greatest
happiness of the greatest number should improperly be the guiding
principle of conduct.
And so utilitarianism has been criticised for focusing on the
consequences rather than the motive or intrinsic nature of an action.
The solution to this is perhaps given by YANG HSIUNG's approach to his
#VIRTUE,
#TOOLS,
#POSITION,
#TIME
#VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
#TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
#POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
#TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
#CANON: #157
We might then consider that there ought to be a specialist field of
BAYESIAN THEORY which we'll term UTILITARIAN PROBABILITY that deals
expressly with the essentiality of the ONTIC premise as the impetus to
any "motive or intrinsic nature of an action. Within our introductory
example as our conception of a PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE
AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE we considered a STATIC LIMITED {ie. #9} TERM of #51
- CONSTANCY (CH'ANG) which we had nuanced to accommodate the need for
COMPLIANCE in being a concern for #27 - DUTY purveying some beneficial
ACTION related to CALAMITY.
But now we want to consider a new condition as a neural linguistic
conception conveying an urgency "THEN SOMETHING TERRIBLE HAPPENED. SO
WHERE CAN WE ESCAPE TO NOW?"
Which has emanated from the UNLIMITED {ie. #72} realm as the world of
action as to then impose a morphological condition onto our previously
STATIC LIMITED {ie. #9} TERM of #51 - CONSTANCY (CH'ANG) and the result
is a DYNAMIC LIMITED {ie. #9} TERM that has not only a different
dialectic as AUTONOMOUS condition which we have to contend with, but now
has different demands placed upon the consideration of any UTILITARIAN
PROBABILITY that deals expressly with the essentiality of the ONTIC
premise as the impetus to any "motive or intrinsic nature of an action".
And lastly the #CENTRE of value PROPOSITION as the DELIMITER which is
relative to the AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE has a different focal context of
#46 - ENLARGEMENT (K'UO): "...WHATEVER SECURITY HE BUILDS IS LIKELY TO
COLLAPSE UNDER PRESSURE, JUST AS THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED ON A
FAULTY FOUNDATION IS SURE TO COLLAPSE." [The Canon of Supreme Mystery, p
291]
On 9/6/20 13:23, wotawonderfulworld wrote:> Dolfy Dolfy Dolfy
I feel your pain. You need to move to a more caring state.
On 9/6/20 09:02, dolf wrote:> I'll give you a contrary manner to such
*public* *depravity* as the
habitual aggrandizing your ignorance as a virtue being then cause for
your statements of dehumanisation as racialism when the problem is
entirely your stupidity ...
Here is a conversation which I had with my sister where she accepts
that
her experience and intelligence quotient cannot transcend to such
(#164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY) from the ACTUS REUS (#205 - PRINCIPLE
OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE) for any vEVENT"
proposition for such."
-----------
That's NEW SOUTH WALES and a different STATE you ignorant fascist turd
There was at the Bega War Memoral Arch Dolf.. I didn't see you there
unfortunately, or i would have pointed it out.
There was no wreath at the BOER WAR MEMORIAL on either Sunday 31 May or
having no loyalty to this country, sovereignty and it’s people like you
have no entitlement to be here.
BEING DUTCH AND FIRST DISCOVERERS WE CAN SAY: *GO* *BACK* *TO* *WHERE*
*YOU* *CAME* *FROM* *YOU* *RACIST* *TURD*
Bordom.. Didn't work with the great Dolf...
— IMPROVING POLICING #101 (LESSONS FROM THE BIBLE)
(c) 2020 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 8 June, 2020
Hey @115 - POTUS my JEWISH TEMPLE #414 - COIN / METASTASIS related to
the BATTLE OF SONS OF LIGHT v’s SONS OF #697 - DARKNESS sent on 13 APRIL
2020 arrived today 1 JUNE 2020.
AND IT HAS AN IMAGE OF YOU ON IT...
POSTSCRIPT 7 JUNE 2020: I'M CURRENTLY TRYING TO RESOLVE THE EXISTENTIAL
CONUNDRUM {ie.
given the temporal extent 8 JUNE 2017 to 8 JUNE 2020 = #1096 days as
implicitly the 'OTH CYCLE of #1092 days + #4 - CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
} as to whether it is possible to consider the #45 - METHODOLOGY which
is implicit to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as then the jurisprudent
means for a determination made of the #15 - MENS REA (#164 - PRINCIPLE
OF MATERIALITY) relative to the #34 - ACTUS REUS (#205 - PRINCIPLE OF
PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE) for any vEVENT.
Since the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS as grounding for the GNOSIS
EX MACHINA dialectic is derived from the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE being an existentiality of the TEMPORAL FABRIC itself:
#1 #2 #3
+8 #0 #4 --->
+7 +6 +5
#2184 / 6 = #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#2184 / 7 = #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#2184 / 8 = #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION
#0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1 ---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
#2184 / 5 = #436 + #4 - IMPERATIVE FOR JUDGMENTS
That my informal intuition is of #0 ---> @2188 (#4 - IMPERATIVE / #1
---> #2184) - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT relating to #414 / #622 - METASTASIS
being anchored #0 ---> upon the *PERIHELION* of 3 JANUARY ---> and #288
/ #325 / #436 - COHESION occurring from that point as then capable in
having #1 ---> #2184 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENCE OVERSIGHT.
GIVEN THE METASTASISED NOTION OF THE #1364 - PARADIGM FOR TOOLS OF #491
- RULE {@82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY} and #873 - COMPASS OF PROBITY {@205 -
PRINCIPLE PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE} WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL ENTITLEMENT TO
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 -
CENTRE INTERLOCK)} BEING IT'S FOUNDATIONAL STONE:
@205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF PROBITY
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <— COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT {#2188 MINUS #4 -
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE EQUALS #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE}
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT
THUSLY IN CONSIDERATION OF #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL BEING A:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 AS A COSMOLOGICAL VIEW
WHEREBY:
#1 #2 #3
+8 #0 #4 --->
+7 +6 +5
THE ONTIC PROPOSITION IS THAT THE #15 - MENS REA (#164 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY) AS GROUNDING IS THEN LIKELY TO BE FRAMED BY THE 'OTH CYCLE
(#1092 DAYS) CONTEXT AS THE METALOGIC (AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER) DERIVATION
POINT FROM WHENCE THE TIME HEURISTIC (FROM 0000 TO 2359 HOURS) CAN
DEDUCE ITS PRAGMA (ie. “a thing done, a fact”):
#1 - 4 JUNE 2020: #1092
#2 - 5 JUNE 2020: #1093
#3 - 6 JUNE 2020: #1094
#4 - 7 JUNE 2020: #1095 as #15 - MENS REA (#164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY)
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Catholic%20Centennial%20Disloyalty%202.png>
#5 ---> 8 JUNE 2020 - #1096 as #34 - ACTUS REUS (#205 - PRINCIPLE OF
PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE) being analogous to the initial vEVENT.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Catholic%20Centennial%20Disloyalty%203.png>
The #0 - NIHILISTIC GROUNDING being then a rhetorical cause for any
subsequent state of being as a metastasis of denial {ie. denying
adversaries' arguments and turning the arguments back on them} by #312 -
CONTRADICTION to reality.
“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath
blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ:
According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the
world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to
himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, to the praise of
the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.
In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins,
according to the riches of his grace;
Wherein he hath abounded toward us in all wisdom and prudence; Having
made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good
pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:
That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather
together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and
which are on earth; even in him:
In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated
according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel
of his own will:
That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in
Christ. In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth,
the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye
were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, which is the earnest of
our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto
the praise of his glory.
Wherefore I also, after I heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus, and
love unto all the saints, cease not to give thanks for you, making
mention of you in my prayers;
That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give
unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him:
The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what
is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his
inheritance in the saints, and what is the exceeding greatness of his
power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty
power, which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and
set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places, far above all
principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is
named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:
And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over
all things to the church, which is his body, the fulness of him that
filleth all in all.” [Ephesians 3:3-23]
Thus if we wanted to consider the TIME HEURISTIC (6 JUNE, 2020 FROM 0000
TO 2359 HOURS) the METALOGIC (AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER) would be relative to:
NATURE: (EGO) as #1 - SOVEREIGN / SELF IDENTITY
NURTURE: (SUPERNAL) as #36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG)
SYNCRETIC: (AMALGAM) as #21 - RELEASE (SHIH) being PRINCIPLE OF
LIABILITY (#9 - AUTONOMY)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?memeBrain>
With respect to FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, this enables one to FOCUS upon the
CRISIS DU JOUR
The crisis of the day, with the implication being that there's always
one happening.
Or *DANS* *MA* *TÊTE* *DU* *JOUR* as what's IN MY HEAD FOR THE DAY
We have now completed the task of conveying a LOGICAL SYLLOGISM result
for any TIME HEURISTIC (TIME RANGE) by including NOUSINFO and CADUCEUS
derived from _AXIOM (getHeurObject)
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Wilmour%20Motors%2020200601.pdf>
The purpose for taking a calendar approach to obtain access to the
temporal heuristic, is simply because the time of day is designated by 4
x 5 minutes x 72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 1440 minutes whereas the day of
year segmentation has been known for several millennia to be a NORMA
OBLIGANS constituted by:
4 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #12 TO TETRA: #80 - LABOURING (CH'IN)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #44 TO TETRA: #27 - DUTIES (SHIH) <-- *TRINOMIAL*
*CONCEPTION* *OF* #NUMBER
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #30 TO TETRA: #36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG) <-- *BOER*
*WAR* *MEMORIAL* DAY 31 MAY
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #77 TO TETRA: #47 - PATTERN (WEN) <-- THE QUESTION IS
APRIORITY OF THE NATURAL ORDER [#47, #41] TO CALENDAR [#41, #47]
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #42 TO TETRA: #41 - RESPONSE (YING)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #18 TO TETRA: #52 - MEASURE (TU)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #37 TO TETRA: #55 - DEMINISHMENT (CHIEN)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #48 TO TETRA: #61 - EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)
ALL THE REST ARE DESIGNATED BY 5 DAYS...
It is unknown to us whether the first designations were known by
PYTHAGORAS at the time of Jewish captivity within Babylon as the
agreeable prototype to the binomial notion of #NUMBER:
MIND (DAO: VIRTUE): #1 {#80 - LABOURING (CH'IN)} + #2 {#27 - DUTIES
(SHIH)} = #3
SCIENCE (DAO: TOOLS): #3 {#36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG)} + #4 {#47 - PATTERN
(WEN)} = #7
OPINION (DAO: POSITION): #5 {#41 - RESPONSE (YING)} + #6 {#52 - MEASURE
(TU)} = #11
SENSE (DAO: TIME): #7 {#55 - DEMINISHMENT (CHIEN)} + #8 {#61 -
EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)} = #15
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Will%20Be%20Done.pdf>
Initial Post: 8 June 2020
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
